Last Updated: Friday, March 6, 2026
The Constitution Two project maintains communities across multiple platforms to encourage thoughtful discussion about constitutional reform, governance, law, and public policy. These communities exist to foster serious, constructive dialogue and collaboration around the development of a modern constitutional framework.
This User Conduct & Community Participation Policy explains the standards expected of participants across official Constitution Two communities, including but not limited to Discord, Reddit, Facebook, BlueSky, and any additional platforms that may be established in the future.
Participation in any Constitution Two community constitutes acceptance of these guidelines.
Across all platforms, participants are expected to engage in discussion that is:
The purpose of these communities is to build ideas, refine proposals, and encourage meaningful civic dialogue. Disruptive behavior that undermines these goals may result in moderation action.
📜 Constitution Two | Community Rules
Welcome to Constitution Two. This community exists to support serious, lawful, and constructive discussion about drafting a modern constitutional framework for the United States. Please follow these rules to help maintain a space that is thoughtful, respectful, and productive.
Debate is encouraged, but personal attacks, harassment, hate speech, and intimidation are not permitted. Address ideas with seriousness and treat other members with basic respect at all times.
Keep discussion focused on Constitution Two, constitutional reform, law, governance, democracy, rights, and public policy. Off-topic conversation should be kept to the appropriate channels, where available.
Do not post spam, advertisements, repetitive links, or unrelated promotional content. Resources may be shared when they are relevant to the discussion and contribute meaningfully to the subject at hand.
This community is organized for a reason. Please use the designated channels for drafts, debate, suggestions, research, updates, and general discussion so ideas remain easy to follow and develop.
Claims presented as fact should be made responsibly. Repeated posting of false, fabricated, or clearly debunked information, especially after correction, may result in moderation action.
Any advocacy of violence, unlawful acts, violent extremism, fascism, insurrection, or unconstitutional seizure of power is strictly prohibited. Content of this kind will result in immediate removal and may lead to a permanent ban.
This project is about building, refining, and improving ideas. Criticism is welcome, but low-effort disruption, bad-faith behavior, and attempts to derail serious discussion are not.
Reddit discussions associated with Constitution Two should follow these principles:
Keep discussions relevant to the thread’s subject and related to constitutional reform, governance, law, or public policy.
Civil disagreement is welcome. Harassment, trolling, or personal attacks are not permitted.
Arguments should be grounded in logic, historical context, legal principles, or real-world examples where appropriate.
This space exists for meaningful discussion. Advertising and promotional content are not allowed. References to other movements or related initiatives are permitted when they contribute to discussion.
The Facebook and BlueSky communities adopt the same standards described in the Discord community rules.
Participants on these platforms are expected to maintain respectful dialogue, avoid harassment or disinformation, and contribute constructively to discussions related to constitutional reform and the Constitution Two project.
As Constitution Two expands to additional platforms, these standards will apply to any official community operated by the project.
Moderation policies may be adapted slightly to account for the technical features of each platform, but the underlying principles of respectful and constructive discussion remain consistent.
Moderators and administrators are selected by the project leadership based on demonstrated engagement and responsible participation within the community.
Selection criteria may include:
Moderators should have the ability to participate across multiple Constitution Two platforms or communities where moderation is required.
Potential moderators are evaluated based on how they engage in discussions, particularly on Constitution Two pages or posts. Individuals who demonstrate thoughtful reasoning, respectful debate, and intellectual honesty are preferred.
Moderators should be actively involved in the community and familiar with ongoing discussions, proposals, and developments within the project.
Moderators must demonstrate patience, fairness, and the ability to resolve disputes without escalating conflict.
Candidates should consistently encourage productive discussion and help guide conversations toward meaningful contributions rather than hostility or disruption.
Moderation positions are granted based on trust and may be revoked if that trust is violated.
The Constitution Two project operates across multiple online platforms. Behavior within one official community may affect participation in others.
Serious violations of community rules, including harassment, extremist advocacy, disinformation campaigns, or attempts to disrupt the project, may result in removal from all Constitution Two communities across platforms.
This cross-platform enforcement helps maintain consistent standards and protects the integrity of the project’s discussion spaces.
Moderators may take actions including:
Moderation decisions are intended to maintain a healthy discussion environment and ensure that community spaces remain productive and welcoming.
The Constitution Two project exists to explore ideas about governance, rights, and democratic reform. These communities are designed to support serious discussion, constructive disagreement, and collaborative development of ideas.
Participants are encouraged to engage thoughtfully, challenge ideas respectfully, and contribute meaningfully to the conversation.
Together, we work to build better ideas about the future of constitutional governance.